Reference: CCPR/C/106/D/1500/2006 |
Decision Year: 2012-10-29 |
Information Source: LALIT and the Human Rights Committee’s follow-up reports |
According to the Victim or his/her Counsel:
| 07/2013 |
No implementation. The State party has failed to specify any practical measures that would effectively guarantee the rights of the authors, to be able to stand as candidate in any future election. |
| 04/2014 |
At a press conference held on 25/04/2014, the Prime Minister affirmed that there would be no electoral reform before the next general election. The implementation of the Consultation paper remains hypothetical, and can hardly be considered as a measure providing them with an effective remedy. |
|
|
Related Articles: -
Article 16
Article 17
Article 19
Article 22
Article 25 (b)
Article 26
Article 5
|
Keywords: -
Equality before the law
Freedom of association
Freedom of expression
Legal Personality
Participation in public affairs
|
Full Case:
|
