According to the Victim or his/her Counsel:
05/2013 |
The author’s counsel indicates that he has submitted a request for the author’s release to the President of Sri Lanka. |
06/2013 and 08/13 |
Further correspondence on 29 June 2013 to the State party’s President, in which he sought the release of Mr. Anura Weerawansa by commuting his sentence to the period of 10 years imprisonment, which he has already served. In the same letter, the author highlights the particularly deplorable conditions of detention of Mr. Weerawansa in the Welikada Prison were highlighted. |
11/2013 |
The author’s counsel claims that his requests are ignored by all branches of the Government. He also submits that granting an official pardon to this person, accepting fictitious documents as confession, and accepting such fraudulent documents prepared by the police as part of the agreement on conditional pardon constituted egregious law violations. The author’s counsel also refers to the fact that charges were drafted against the author even before the commencement of the recording of his statement. He reiterates that the whole judicial procedure was flawed, biased, and unconstitutional. Recalling that five years elapsed since the adoption of the Committee’s Views, the author’s counsel observes that there has been no initiative from the State party to implement this decision.The author’s counsel invites the Committee, in particular, to expose the unconstitutional nature of the judicial process concerning the author, and to assist him in finding appropriate legal assistance to make progress in the author’s case. |
|