Reference: CCPR/C/104/D/1905/2009

Decision Year: 2012.03.26

Information Source: Human Rights Committee’s Follow-up Report on Views (CCPR/107/3) & Follow-up Report on views (Oct. 2014)

According to the Victim or his/her Counsel:

Committee's assessment 122nd session (CCPR/C/122/R.2)

• (a) Effective remedy: E;  
• (b) Non-repetition: D

Committee’s decision: Suspend follow-up dialogue with the finding of unsatisfactory implementation. For non-repetition, continue to follow up in the framework of the reporting procedure.

Committee's decision at Annual Report A/69/40 (VOL I): Follow-up dialogue ongoing. The Committee’s recommendation has not been implemented.

Related Articles:

• Article 10.1 Article 16 Article 2.3 Article 6.1 Article 7 Article 9.1 Article 9.2 Article 9.3 Article 9.4

Keywords:

• Arbitrary arrest Effective remedy Legal Personality Right to life Torture / ill-treatment

Case Summary: link Click Here

Full Case:

• link Fr link Sp

Implementation

Committee's assessment 122nd session (CCPR/C/122/R.2)

• (a) Effective remedy: E;  
• (b) Non-repetition: D

Committee’s decision: Suspend follow-up dialogue with the finding of unsatisfactory implementation. For non-repetition, continue to follow up in the framework of the reporting procedure.

Committee's decision at Annual Report A/69/40 (VOL I): Follow-up dialogue ongoing. The Committee’s recommendation has not been implemented.