About the Centre

Warsame v. Canada

Reference: CCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010

Decision Year: 2011.07.21

Information Source: Follow-up Report on Views (Oct. 2014)

According to the Victim or his/her Counsel:

Committee's assessment 112nd (CCPR/C/112/3):

  • (a) Remedy: E (b) Publication of the Views: No information

Committee’s decision: Follow-up dialogue ongoing. The State party should ensure diplomatic follow-up and regularly report to the Committee on the author’s whereabouts.

Related Articles:

  • Article 12.4 Article 17 Article 18 Article 2.3 Article 23.1 Article 6.1 Article 7

Keywords:

  • Effective remedy Freedom of movement Protection of family Right to life Torture / ill-treatment

Case Summary: link Click Here

Full Case:

Implementation

Committee's assessment 112nd (CCPR/C/112/3):

  • (a) Remedy: E (b) Publication of the Views: No information

Committee’s decision: Follow-up dialogue ongoing. The State party should ensure diplomatic follow-up and regularly report to the Committee on the author’s whereabouts.

Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee

Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee CCPR/C/3/Rev.10

English | French | Russian | Spanish | Chinese

CCPR NGO Participation

Documents adopted by the Human Rights Committee (March 2012)

English | French | Spanish | Russian | Handbook

CCPR NHRI Participation

Documents adopted by the Human Rights Committee (November 2012)

English | French | Spanish | Russian | Arabic | Chinese