About the Centre

Ismailov v. Uzbekistan

Reference: CCPR/C/101/D/1769/2008

Decision Year: 2011-03-25

Information Source: Follow-up Report on Views (Oct. 2014)

According to the Victim or his/her Counsel:
No measures were undertaken to offer the victim an effective remedy. The State party is preventing her husband from exercising his right to seek pardon. There is no more need to comment on the State party's observations, which deny most of her substantiated arguments. Her comment may have negative consequences for her husband.

Related Articles:

  • Article 14.1 Article 14.3 (b) Article 14.3 (e) Article 14.3 (g) Article 17.1 Article 9.2 Article 9.3

Keywords:

  • Fair hearing

Full Case:

https://www.fapjunk.com
kalkinmaatolyesi.org bahis siteleri
deneme bonusu veren siteler

Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee

Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee CCPR/C/3/Rev.10

Arabic | Chinese | English | French | Russian | Spanish

CCPR NGO Participation

Documents adopted by the Human Rights Committee (March 2012)

English | French | Spanish | Russian | Handbook

CCPR NHRI Participation

Documents adopted by the Human Rights Committee (November 2012)

English | French | Spanish | Russian | Arabic | Chinese