M.N. et al. v. Tajikistan

Reference: CCPR/C/106/D/1500/2006

Decision Year: 2012-10-29

Information Source: LALIT and the Human Rights Committee’s follow-up reports

According to the Victim or his/her Counsel:

07/2013 No implementation. The State party has failed to specify any practical measures that would effectively guarantee the rights of the authors, to be able to stand as candidate in any future election.
04/2014 At a press conference held on 25/04/2014, the Prime Minister affirmed that there would be no electoral reform before the next general election.  The implementation of the Consultation paper remains hypothetical, and can hardly be considered as a measure providing them with an effective remedy.
 

Related Articles:

  • Article 16 Article 17 Article 19 Article 22 Article 25 (b) Article 26 Article 5

Keywords:

  • Equality before the law Freedom of association Freedom of expression Legal Personality Participation in public affairs

Full Case:

Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee

Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee CCPR/C/3/Rev.10

Arabic | Chinese | English | French | Russian | Spanish

CCPR NGO Participation

Documents adopted by the Human Rights Committee (March 2012)

English | French | Spanish | Russian | Handbook

CCPR NHRI Participation

Documents adopted by the Human Rights Committee (November 2012)

English | French | Spanish | Russian | Arabic | Chinese