Marz v. Russian Federation

Reference: CCPR/C/97/D/1425/2005

Decision Year: 2009-10-21

Information Source: Follow-up Report on views (Mar. 2014)

According to the Victim or his/her Counsel:

04/2013 and 05/2013 The author informed the Committee that its Views had not been implemented by the State party. He claimed that his daughters were not allowed to leave the State party’s territory as there was an order forbidding them to leave the country.
06/2013 The author refers to his previous correspondence, and challenges the State party’s arguments. He reiterates that he and his daughters were the victims of false allegations.
 

Related Articles:

  • Article 14.1 Article 14.3 (d) Article 15.1 Article 26 Article 9.1 Article 9.5

Keywords:

  • Equality before the law Fair hearing Retroactivity of the law Right to defence

Full Case:

Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee

Rules of Procedure of the Human Rights Committee CCPR/C/3/Rev.10

Arabic | Chinese | English | French | Russian | Spanish

CCPR NGO and NHRI Participation

Documents adopted by the Human Rights Committee (March 2012)

English | French | Spanish | Russian | Handbook